if connected

Strategy and analysis about mobile, smartphones, tablets and connected experiences

PAYG Facebook, Bebo, Twitter makes ‘smartphones’ irrelevant

with 3 comments

Orange are promoting social networking and Internet access on pre pay so-called ‘featurephones’ (see photo on the right). Consumers care about what their phones can do not what artificial term the mobile industry chooses. No one can define the term ‘smartphone’ unambigously and no one defines ‘smartphone’ the same as anyone else. It’s meaningless.

On various briefing calls yesterday Nokia defended their (tenuous) position in high end phones by repeatedly claiming to be the leading maker of ‘smartphones’ — but 45% of a non-existent category is a useless metric. Consumers certainly don’t get it: Series 60 (“smart”) and Series 40 (not, ‘featurephone’) look virtually identical on the surface, and neither looks comparable in their online abilities compared with Android, iPhone, Palm, the INQ1 or even Windows Mobile.

Instead, what matters is how good phones are at doing the Internet or for Facebook. Everyone must focus on ‘Internet phones’ in developing mobile strategy or mobile phone marketing.

Orange’s in-store Internet-centric messaging is strong, but they are missing a trick with their online store as there’s no option there to filter phones by features such as ‘Facebook’ or ‘Internet’.

Update Friday, August 14 – See this Forrester report by me for more on “smartphones”: The “Smartphone” Is Dead: Long Live Smart Phones And Smart Gadgets

Written by Ian Fogg

August 13, 2009 at 9:52 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , , , ,

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I agree with this message!

    Although I might generalize to end-user focus rather than “internet”.

    My current annoyance with phones, having had to replace mine on short notice after smashing it, is the fact I’ve gained a number of features I didn’t want, and appear to have lost one I really cared about – battery life.

    Michael Stevens

    August 13, 2009 at 1:49 pm

  2. Ahah, you want one of these:

    http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/06/the-launch-of-the-land-rover-s1-by-sonim/ (video)

    or for a spec sheet, that lists among other things 1500 hours standby time:
    http://www.sonimtech.com/features_xp3quest.php

    Ian Fogg

    August 13, 2009 at 11:42 pm

  3. Ooh, that is nice. AND I like the indestructible feature too.

    Expensive though.

    Michael Stevens

    August 14, 2009 at 9:08 am


Agree? Disagree? Please comment, thx

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s